Get an Attorney?? Seattle Home Sellers Getting Less Than Intelligent Legal Advice…

Get an Attorney??  Seattle Home Sellers Getting Less Than Intelligent Legal Advice – Did I Mention They Have To Pay For This Advice?

I just met with a prospective buyer looking to purchase one of my short sale listings.  During our conversation, I learned he had just finished short selling his primary residence.  He explained there were two mortgages on the home and he used an attorney to negotiate with the bank.  I asked the gentleman if he used the HAFA short sale program.  A little disgruntled, he explained that his attorney didn’t even tell him about the HAFA program.  Now, he is having to receive daily phone calls from the second lien holder, who’s trying to collect over $100,000.00.

As short sale agent specialists, we are supposed to advise every client to consult with an attorney regarding legal advice.  This is very difficult for many home owners because attorneys are expensive.  The opening story makes me question the skill and care given to home owners by attorneys in this real estate environment.  The government and the banks are changing programs so quickly, overwhelmed attorneys are having a difficult time staying up to speed with program changes.  In summary, do your own research.  Don’t just trust an attorney.  While attorneys may be well versed in property law, their education doesn’t cover short sale negotiations.

Article Written by Aaron Harrington, Preferred Realtor of www.EasySeattleShortSale.com

Have questions about short selling your home?  Schedule a free consultation today, CLICK HERE.

Posted in Financial Safety, Foreclosure, Fraud and Scams, HAFA, Mortgage / Real Estate Laws, Seattle, Short Sale Information | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

MBA Q2 2010: 14.42% of Mortgage Loans Delinquent or in Foreclosure

The MBA reports that 14.42 percent of mortgage loans were either one payment delinquent or in the foreclosure process in Q2 2010 (seasonally adjusted). This is down slightly from the record 14.69 percent in Q1 2010.

From the MBA: Delinquencies and Foreclosure Starts Decrease in Latest MBA National Delinquency Survey

The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties dropped to a seasonally adjusted rate of 9.85 percent of all loans outstanding as of the end of the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of 21 basis points from the first quarter of 2010, and an increase of 61 basis points from one year ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) National Delinquency Survey.

The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the second quarter was 4.57 percent, a decrease of six basis points from the first quarter of 2010, but an increase of 27 basis points from one year ago.

Note: 9.85% (SA) and 4.57% equals 14.42%.

Much was made at the end of 2009 about the decline in the 30 day delinquency “bucket” (percent of loans between 30 and 60 days delinquent). Unfortunately the seasonally adjusted 30 day delinquency rate increased again in Q2 2010.

And much was made on the conference call this morning about the declines in the other “buckets”, however the total percent of loans delinquent or in the foreclosure process declined only slightly in Q2 from Q1 – and is the second highest on record.

Note: there are some questions about the seasonal adjustment, especially for the 90 day bucket since we’ve never seen numbers this high before, but the adjustment for the 30 and 60 day periods are probably reasonable.



Loans 30 days delinquent increased to 3.51%, and this is about the same levels as in Q4 2008 (slightly below the peak of 3.77% in Q1 2009).

Delinquent loans decreased in all other buckets – especially in the 90+ day bucket. MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann suggested the decline in the 90+ day bucket was because of some successful modifications – since the lenders reported the loans as delinquent until the modification was made permanent.

The second graph shows the delinquency rate by state (red is seriously delinquent: 90+ days or in foreclosure, blue is delinquent less than 90 days).

Clearly Florida and Nevada have a large percentage of loans delinquent or in foreclosure. But the delinquency problem is widespread with 36 states and D.C. all having total delinquency rates above 10%.

When asked if he expected the slight improvements to continue, Brinkmann said “Improvements are more of a hope”. He said the problem is jobs, and he is revising down his economic forecasts. He also the improvement in the 90+ day bucket might be because of modifications – and that might not continue.

With house prices falling – and growth slowing – the delinquency rate will probably increase later this year.

Have questions about short selling your home?  Schedule a free consultation today, CLICK HERE.

Posted in Credit, Foreclosure, HAFA, Lending, Loan Modification Information, Market Commentary | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bank Earnings Reports for Q2 2010: Unbelievably Good

Bank Earnings Reports for Q2 2010: Unbelievably Good

During the past few weeks, the largest of the Wall Street banks have reported their earnings for second quarter 2010, and the reports are quite rosy. However, after reading these reports and comparing the data on which they are based with the data reported to bank regulators, I have come to the conclusion that the positive results are the result of smoke and mirrors, and, potentially, improper accounting practices.

UNDERWATER ON YOUR MORTGAGE?  SHORT SALE NOW, CLICK HERE

At issue is what constitutes a “nonperforming asset.” For reporting purposes, the banks appear to be counting only loans in nonaccrual status and foreclosed real estate. Unfortunately, this badly misrepresents the banks’ actual asset quality and earnings.

For example, look at Bank of America, which reported 2Q earnings of $3.1 billion and nonperforming assets (nonperforming loans, leases & foreclosed properties) of only $35.701 billion. Unfortunately, regulatory data for 2Q will not be available until late August, but we can compare information for 1Q 2010, for which BofA reports nonperforming assets of $35.925 billion. Yet, on its 1Q 2010 Y9C regulatory filing for the consolidated holding company, BofA reports $38.819 billion in nonaccrual loans, $3.274 billion in foreclosed real estate, but also $37.060 billion in loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest, and $24.938 billion in loans past due 30 – 89 days and still accruing interest. In other words, non-current assets total $104.091 billion, while “nonperforming assets” total only $35.925 billion. How convenient!

As bad as this looks, things get worse. Bof A is still accruing interest on $37 billion in loans that have missed at least three monthly payments. Assuming an average interest rate of 5%, this translates into accrued interest of almost $2 billion per year on loans to borrowers that are highly unlikely to ever make another payment.

This is really bad, but things get even worse. If and, most likely, when the bank has to move these loans into nonaccrual status, it will have to charge off the loan, resulting in a future hit to earnings of up to $37 billion. Even if the ultimate recoveries are 50%, this implies a future hit to earnings of more than $18 billion.

Bank of America is not alone in this shady accounting practice. Wells Fargo reports 2Q 2010 nonperforming assets of $32.936 billion. For 1Q, Wells reports nonperforming assets of $31.500 billion and an additional $5.957 billion in loans 90+ days past due and still accruing interest. (I credit Wells with at least making a partial effort to report its past due portfolio!) Yet on its 1Q 2010 Y9C filing, Wells reports $27.408 billion in nonaccrual loans, $3.976 billion in foreclosed real estate, $38.629 billion in loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing, and $20.914 billion in loans past due 30 – 89 days and still accruing interest. In other words, noncurrent assets total $90.927 billion while “nonperforming assets” total only $31.500 billion.

As with BofA, Wells is still accruing interest on $38 billion in loans that have missed at least three monthly payments. Again, this translates into almost $2 billion per year in earnings on loans to borrowers that are highly unlikely to ever make another payment.

But what about that paragon of banking virtue—J.P. Morgan Chase? Surely, JPM would never engage in such shady reporting? Think again! For 1Q 2010, JPM reports nonperforming assets of $19.019 billion. Yet on its 1Q 2010 Y9C filing, JPM reports $28.079 billion in nonaccrual loans, $2.216 billion in foreclosed real estate, $24.006 billion in loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing, and $14.250 billion in loans past due 30 – 89 days and still accruing interest. In other words, noncurrent assets total $68.551 billion while “nonperforming assets” total only $19.019 billion.

As with BofA and Wells, JPM is continuing to accrue interest on its past due 90+ portfolio, but its smaller past due portfolio translates into a smaller gain—only about $1.5 billion per year in earnings on loans to borrowers who are highly unlikely to ever make another payment.

So, I now await publication of the 2Q 2010 regulatory filings, which I’m sure will confirm that these three banks, which control $5.6 trillion in banking assets, have materially misrepresented their true asset quality and earnings.

How can they get away with this? It is difficult to answer that question. The reporting rules are quite clear. A loan past due more than 90 days is supposed to be reclassified as nonaccrual and charged off unless it meets two criteria: (1) it is adequately secured; and (2) it is in the process of collection, which means that collection efforts are expected to result in the prompt repayment of the debt or its restoration to current status.

I challenge these banks to document how their past due loan portfolios meet these two criteria.

FOR ALL YOUR SHORT SALE NEEDS, VISIT WWW.EASYSEATTLESHORTSALE.COM

Have questions about short selling your home?  Schedule a free consultation today, CLICK HERE.

Posted in Credit, Lending | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Short sales overtaking REOs

Short sales overtaking REOs

According to the Las Vegas Association of Realtors in November of 2009 out of approximately 11,000 pending sales, short sales accounted for 8,935 pending sales or 67% – while REO pending sales were a miniscule 2,367. These percentages did a virtual flip flop from the same period in 2008 and many markets around the country are seeing the same trend.

Have questions about short selling your home?  Schedule a free consultation today, CLICK HERE.

Posted in Foreclosure, Short Sale Information | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t fall for foreclosure scams in Seattle – we’re smarter than that….

Don’t Hand Your House to a Thief


Mortgage scams come in 31 flavors. Here are three top choices of con artists and how to avoid them.

More than 323,000 properties entered some state of foreclosure in the first quarter of 2006, a 72% increase over the same period a year ago, according to Realty Trac.

Scammers know that people in trouble make easy victims. They’re swooping in and offering to “help” borrowers — and ending up with their house. Victims sometimes spend years fighting to get their homes back and some never succeed.

Scam No. 1: the Bailout, AKA Equity Stripping

In theory, a person or company could help a homeowner keep his house via a process in which the homeowner sells the house very cheaply to them while the homeowner gets his finances in order. The new owner pays the mortgage, and the old homeowner pays to live in the home in the meantime, buying back the home (with interest) in a fixed amount of time. If the financial setbacks are temporary, everybody can win: The homeowner keeps the house and the company earns a profit for its role as rescuer.

But reconveyance, as it’s sometimes known, is ripe for abuse.

Suppose you’ve got a $400,000 home, with $100,000 of equity in it. A divorce and medical bills have you facing foreclosure. Suddenly, the phone rings with a bailout proposal.

So you sell your home, for $320,000 — not much more than what’s owed on the mortgage. Why sell for so little? Because it’s never intended to be a true sale; remember, you don’t think you’re selling the house permanently, but buying it back in a short period, right?

The new purchaser, meanwhile, takes out a $320,000 loan, wipes out any liens on your property and even gets you a little cash back; and you get a two-year lease with a purchase option at the end.

But soon you realize you’re in trouble. Why? Because scammers aren’t about to let you get your home back. Often, the lease terms desperate homeowners agree to turn out to be as onerous as their previous mortgage payments that helped get them into trouble. Con artists also manipulate victims when facing crucial deadlines.

Clients are often told that payments are going be to under $1,000 a month. But the criminals dragged out the process until the foreclosure was imminent and they were backed into a corner. When they got to the closing they often change the terms for rent, example would be to raise the rent to $1,450. This increase is likely to make them default on the rent.

The process to get to this point is often dragged out and leads to the home owner having very few options at this point because the bank is so close to foreclosure and taking back the home.

This likely leaves you with the only option of agreeing to the higher rent and once you default on this rent payment the new purchaser evicts you as soon as possible, sells your $400,000 house, pays off the $320,000 loan and pockets about $80,000 — all for a few months of work. Some people don’t even fight back because they don’t know they have options — such as calling a lawyer.

Don’t do any of the following:

  • Don’t fall for promises like “We’ll save your credit”; “We’ll buy your house ‘as is’”; or “We’ll get you a new mortgage with low monthly payments.”
  • Don’t sign away ownership of your property (sometimes called a “quit claim deed”) to anyone without the advice of lawyer you trust. “When people get behind on their loan payments, they get a bit desperate, but the answer is not putting someone else on your title,” says Oakland real-estate attorney James Hand.
  • Beware of any home sale contract where you aren’t formally released from liability for your mortgage. Also, make sure you know what rights you’re giving up and that you agree to giving them up.

Scam No. 2: Phantom Help

This scheme is fairly simple: Let’s say you’re way behind on your home payments and facing foreclosure. An individual or group approaches and offers to help — then charges you thousands of dollars for various administrative duties like filing forms and phone calls, or else keeps simply promising a big rescue later. You can probably guess what’s really going on: The “helper” isn’t really doing anything at all to stop your foreclosure despite collecting thousands from you. By the time you figure out you’ve been hoodwinked, it’s often too late to stop the loss of your home.

How did the scammer know to target you, anyway? That’s easy: When a lender schedules the home for public auction, the matter becomes public record. In just more than half of the states, a lawsuit must be filed in order to spur a sale. Anyone can check the court documents to find the list of lawsuits. Soon a letter or phone call comes like something from a guardian angel — only it’s a vulture.

In the other states (including California and Massachusetts, for example), the process doesn’t go through the courts; foreclosure sales simply must be advertised publicly, as in the local newspaper. This latter process usually moves faster — and makes an already-stressed homeowner even more vulnerable to a scam.

Do’s and don’ts:

  • Do call your mortgage company or lender if you’re in trouble. Ask for the loss mitigation department. If you take a proactive aproach you will have a better chance of working something out with your current lender and avoid possibly avoid foreclosure. Lenders do not want to take back your home through foreclosure.
  • Don’t call for assistance from one of those ubiquitous signs on telephone poles that advertise help. Chances are, that’s not where help lies.
  • Do proceed with caution, if a company or person:
    - Describes itself as a “mortgage consultant,” “foreclosure service,” or something similar;
    - Collects a fee before giving any services;
    - Advertises to people whose homes are listed for foreclosure, including anyone who sends fliers or solicits door-to-door; and says you should make home mortgage payments directly to them or to their company instead of your mortgage lender.
  • Don’t panic. Get full information on the foreclosure process in your state. Make sure you know ALL deadlines — for court, for document filings, etc. States usually have associations that can offer free advice.

Scam No. 3: The bait-and-switch

In this scam, which NCLC calls the “bait-and-switch,” con artists actually trick a homeowner into signing over the deed to a home — without his knowledge.

How could somebody fall for this?

You don’t have to be old or a non-English speaker to be stymied by the legalese. These schemers get their victims to sign incredibly complicated legal documents that resulted in their property being transferred to entities such as trusts. “Most attorneys can’t understand these trust agreements. And if a criminal can’t get the signature, forgery goes a long way in real estate these days.

Do’s and don’ts

  • Don’t sign anything that has any blank spaces. Information could be added later that you didn’t agree to. (Yes, it happens.)
  • Never sign a contract under pressure. Always know exactly what you’re signing. Take your time to review the paperwork thoroughly — ideally with a lawyer who only represents your interests.
  • Never make a verbal agreement. Get all promises in writing and get full copies.

Cast a jaundiced eye at deals that sound too good to be true. Lately, some scam artists promise they’ll wipe out or pay off your home’s debt for you (so-called “debt elimination”). Some flustered homeowners bite. Just remember the free lunch rule: There isn’t one.

A final thought: Remember, if you can’t fix your finances, selling your house (on the normal market that is) may not be the end of the world. Sure, you’ll be a renter again. But given how much homes around the country have appreciated in the last several years, chances are you’ve made some money, which you can use to get back on your feet.

Update September 6th 2008: If you are considering a short sale please CONTACT ME HERE.

Have questions about short selling your home?  Schedule a free consultation today, CLICK HERE.

Posted in Foreclosure, Fraud and Scams, Seattle | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Save your house

How Obama’s homeowner bailout crashed and burned  

Save your house by not paying your mortgage. Sounds crazy, doesn’t it? But for more than a million homeowners, this might be the right answer. Those homeowners, for whatever reason, have defaulted on their first mortgage but continue to pay their second mortgage on time. This has created a crazy situation in which the lender holding the second lien is reporting a performing loan while the lender holding the first lien is reporting a delinquent loan. The majority of these second liens are held in the loan portfolios of just four banks – Bank of America, Citibank, J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo. These same four banks service most of the first mortgages owned by bondholders or other banks. When Joe Homeowner defaults on his first mortgage but continues to pay his second mortgage and then seeks relief from the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) or his first lender, he often is unable to obtain relief because the holder of the second lien refuses to take a loss on the lien. This upsets the whole priority of claimants in the event of default. The second lien holder is supposed to get wiped out before the first lien holder suffers a dollar of damage, but that isn’t happening in this bizarre world.

Do you need help out of foreclosure, CLICK HERE

What is the solution? Stop paying your second mortgage. This will work because of the way bank regulators treat delinquent loans. So long as Joe Homeowner remains current on his second mortgage, the big bank has to hold just 8 cents in capital for each dollar outstanding. However, if Joe stops paying, the big bank must classify the loan as delinquent and allocate funds to a reserve for loan losses.

The longer it has been since Joe stopped paying, the more loan-loss reserves the bank must hold. After 30 days, the bank typically should allocate 20 cents in reserves for each dollar outstanding, maxing out at 100 cents on the dollar after 180 days. Now the big bank has a totally different set of incentives when it comes to negotiating the restructuring of Joe‘s first mortgage. Now the big bank will want to get this deadbeat loan off its balance sheet and will take virtually anything offered. Voila! Holdup problem solved.

The critical role of second liens in hamstringing the HAMP and other foreclosure-mitigation programs has been almost universally acknowledged. The majority of delinquent mortgages and mortgages in the process of foreclosure also involve second liens on the same properties, and many borrowers have been paying their second liens while defaulting on their first liens. Consequently, second-lien holders have been unwilling to “play ball” by taking large write-downs on their investments as part of efforts to avoid foreclosure on the delinquent first liens, even though the second liens are, in most cases, virtually worthless once the property reaches the end of the foreclosure process and is sold at sheriff’s auction, typically for less than the outstanding amount on the first lien.

Bank regulators (the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) have the power to end this second-lien holdup problem, but, instead, they are complicit in this scam by not requiring the second lien to be classified at least as severely delinquent as the first lien. Were regulators to act in a consistent manner, banks would be facing large write-downs on much of their second-lien portfolios and would be far more willing to negotiate with borrowers and first-lien holders on loan restructurings to keep properties out of foreclosure.

Why would regulators behave this way? The four largest banks in the country hold more than $400 billion in second liens and would take massive hits to their already-thin capital were regulators to act. For example, Wells Fargo holds more than $120 billion in home equity loans but less than $80 billion in tangible common equity. Were Wells Fargo forced to make appropriate provisions for its second liens, it would have to transfer a large portion of its tangible common equity to its allowance for loan losses, forcing it into an undercapitalized or even insolvent status.

So much for the vaunted stress test trumpeted by regulators last year. Of course, that is another reason for regulators not to use this power; it would make them look bad for failing to account for this problem in the stress tests.

By Rebel A. Cole

-

The Washington Times

STOP FORECLOSURE TODAY, VISIT WWW.EASYSEATTLESHORTSALE.COM

Posted in Foreclosure, HAFA, Making Homes Affordable (MHA), Seattle | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Housing Crisis Sleepless In Seattle by Aaron Harrington

Housing Crisis Sleepless In Seattle by Aaron Harrington

Inventory levels continue to climb.  Traditionally, the middle of the year has the highest levels of real estate inventory in the greater Seattle market.  Inventory levels differ at their peaks each year, but this year might just produce the largest amount of September inventory in the past 10 years.  Did I mention, these levels of inventory are happening as interest rates approach 4% for a 30 year fixed rate. 

My market commentary video below will show the yearly inventory graph for King County and the corresponding monthly pending sales volumes.  Since the end of the first time home buyer credit in April, the number of sales has plummeted.  Basically, the graph shows we sucked demand forward versus creating new demand for homes in Seattle.  Furthermore you’ll be able to see the absorption rates in the market.  These levels are crucial for pricing property.  A good pricing strategy takes into consideration not only past comparable sales, but also current absorption rates.

Article provided by Aaron Harrington – Preferred Realtor of EasySeattleShortSale.com

For Assistance With Short Sales, Click Here

Posted in Credit, Foreclosure, Lending, Market Commentary, Seattle, Washington | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“I think I’ll Just Wait Till The Market Gets Better….”

“I think I’ll Just Wait Till The Market Gets Better…”

I’ve been hearing from seller’s, “I think I’ll just wait to sell until the market gets better.” Well, I don’t think you’re going to see this for the next 2-3 years and maybe even longer. Attached here is my August 2010 King County Market commentary. In summary, inventory is rising, interest rates are at record lows and still buyers are not consuming enough of the inventory in King County to curb falling prices. So, unless you’re interested in staying in your home for the next 5-10 years, there’s no better time to sell than today.

To Request A Meeting About Selling Your Home, Click Here

Facing Foreclosure or Need To Do a Short Sale, Click Here

To View This Video At Screencast Click Here

Commentary provided by Aaron Harrington. 

Aaron Harrington is the preferred realtor of EasySeattleShortSale.com.  Aaron is very passionate about real estate and the markets.  To contact Aaron directly, call 206.251.5467

Posted in Financial Safety, Lending, Market Commentary, Preparedness, Seattle, Washington | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Foreclosure Could End This Mess

Foreclosure Could End This Mess

Housing has been getting hammered recently, and many on Wall Street and Washington are speculating that with falling homes sales, there may be another round of good ol’ stimulus money to help get the housing market back on track.  I am not opposed to the government stepping in and using taxpayer’s money to reinvigorate the housing market, I am opposed to the government using the stimulus in nonsensical and ineffective ways.

The purpose of housing stimulus should not be to prop-up home prices to artificially unsustainable inflated values or to assist homeowners with tax credits. We need the right kind of government intervention, or we will continue to see the U.S. government surpass the already $6 trillion it has spent on stimulus money over the past 18 months.

My solution is that the government should encourage banks, borrowers, and underwater homeowners to quickly foreclose their homes. Banks will be reluctant to do this because they will be taking a loss when the home sells at a lower price, but in the long term the housing market cannot move forward until all the foreclosures have been cleaned up. Foreclosures are a perfectly appropriate exit tactic given our budget deficit and the previous round of lackluster tax credits.

Posted in Foreclosure, Market Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In Some Cities, Trulia Finds It’s Now Cheaper to Rent than Own

Metropolitan areas in Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma made a top-10 list of cities where renting is cheaper than home buying, according to the results of a new study of the 50 largest US cities by online real estate marketplace Trulia.

“At the peak of the real estate bubble, cities like Miami, Phoenix and Las Vegas were not affordable for many. Now the opposite is true,” said Pete Flint, co-founder and CEO of Trulia.com. “Home sellers in these hard hit areas are forced to lower their prices to compete with all the foreclosures on the market. As a result, these unattainable markets are so affordable it makes better financial sense to buy than rent.”

The top areas where house prices worked out to be more expensive than renting were New York, Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco. Omaha, Neb., Oklahoma City, Okla., and Kansas City, Mo. also cracked the top-10 list.

“We’re not suggesting that it’s unwise to buy in these areas though — just that it’s significantly more expensive than renting. In many of these cities, even though home buying is much more costly than renting, prices are still much lower than they have been in a long, long time,” Flint said.

The top areas where owning is less expensive than renting included Minneapolis, Miami, Fresno, Calif. and two cities in Texas — Arlington and San Antonio. Phoenix, Ariz. and Las Vegas also made the top-10 list of the buyer-friendly areas.

Trulia compared the average list price to the average rent on two-bedroom apartments, condos and townhomes listed on its website. Homeownership prices included mortgage principal and interest, property taxes, hazard insurance, closing costs and homeowner association dues. Trulia also included offsets such as tax advantages of homeownership and closing cost deductions.

Written by Jon Prior

Posted in Market Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment