Housing Crisis Sleepless In Seattle by Aaron Harrington

Housing Crisis Sleepless In Seattle by Aaron Harrington

Inventory levels continue to climb.  Traditionally, the middle of the year has the highest levels of real estate inventory in the greater Seattle market.  Inventory levels differ at their peaks each year, but this year might just produce the largest amount of September inventory in the past 10 years.  Did I mention, these levels of inventory are happening as interest rates approach 4% for a 30 year fixed rate. 

My market commentary video below will show the yearly inventory graph for King County and the corresponding monthly pending sales volumes.  Since the end of the first time home buyer credit in April, the number of sales has plummeted.  Basically, the graph shows we sucked demand forward versus creating new demand for homes in Seattle.  Furthermore you’ll be able to see the absorption rates in the market.  These levels are crucial for pricing property.  A good pricing strategy takes into consideration not only past comparable sales, but also current absorption rates.

Article provided by Aaron Harrington – Preferred Realtor of EasySeattleShortSale.com

For Assistance With Short Sales, Click Here

“I think I’ll Just Wait Till The Market Gets Better….”

“I think I’ll Just Wait Till The Market Gets Better…”

I’ve been hearing from seller’s, “I think I’ll just wait to sell until the market gets better.” Well, I don’t think you’re going to see this for the next 2-3 years and maybe even longer. Attached here is my August 2010 King County Market commentary. In summary, inventory is rising, interest rates are at record lows and still buyers are not consuming enough of the inventory in King County to curb falling prices. So, unless you’re interested in staying in your home for the next 5-10 years, there’s no better time to sell than today.

To Request A Meeting About Selling Your Home, Click Here

Facing Foreclosure or Need To Do a Short Sale, Click Here

To View This Video At Screencast Click Here

Commentary provided by Aaron Harrington. 

Aaron Harrington is the preferred realtor of EasySeattleShortSale.com.  Aaron is very passionate about real estate and the markets.  To contact Aaron directly, call 206.251.5467

Foreclosure Could End This Mess

Foreclosure Could End This Mess

Housing has been getting hammered recently, and many on Wall Street and Washington are speculating that with falling homes sales, there may be another round of good ol’ stimulus money to help get the housing market back on track.  I am not opposed to the government stepping in and using taxpayer’s money to reinvigorate the housing market, I am opposed to the government using the stimulus in nonsensical and ineffective ways.

The purpose of housing stimulus should not be to prop-up home prices to artificially unsustainable inflated values or to assist homeowners with tax credits. We need the right kind of government intervention, or we will continue to see the U.S. government surpass the already $6 trillion it has spent on stimulus money over the past 18 months.

My solution is that the government should encourage banks, borrowers, and underwater homeowners to quickly foreclose their homes. Banks will be reluctant to do this because they will be taking a loss when the home sells at a lower price, but in the long term the housing market cannot move forward until all the foreclosures have been cleaned up. Foreclosures are a perfectly appropriate exit tactic given our budget deficit and the previous round of lackluster tax credits.

In Some Cities, Trulia Finds It’s Now Cheaper to Rent than Own

Metropolitan areas in Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma made a top-10 list of cities where renting is cheaper than home buying, according to the results of a new study of the 50 largest US cities by online real estate marketplace Trulia.

“At the peak of the real estate bubble, cities like Miami, Phoenix and Las Vegas were not affordable for many. Now the opposite is true,” said Pete Flint, co-founder and CEO of Trulia.com. “Home sellers in these hard hit areas are forced to lower their prices to compete with all the foreclosures on the market. As a result, these unattainable markets are so affordable it makes better financial sense to buy than rent.”

The top areas where house prices worked out to be more expensive than renting were New York, Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco. Omaha, Neb., Oklahoma City, Okla., and Kansas City, Mo. also cracked the top-10 list.

“We’re not suggesting that it’s unwise to buy in these areas though — just that it’s significantly more expensive than renting. In many of these cities, even though home buying is much more costly than renting, prices are still much lower than they have been in a long, long time,” Flint said.

The top areas where owning is less expensive than renting included Minneapolis, Miami, Fresno, Calif. and two cities in Texas — Arlington and San Antonio. Phoenix, Ariz. and Las Vegas also made the top-10 list of the buyer-friendly areas.

Trulia compared the average list price to the average rent on two-bedroom apartments, condos and townhomes listed on its website. Homeownership prices included mortgage principal and interest, property taxes, hazard insurance, closing costs and homeowner association dues. Trulia also included offsets such as tax advantages of homeownership and closing cost deductions.

Written by Jon Prior

Excessively delaying Fannie Mae foreclosures will now cost servicers

Fannie Mae will now review the compensatory fees due to servicers in cases where the government sponsored entity feel servicers are unnecessarily delaying foreclosure.

In a letter sent to servicers, Fannie Mae said it plans to review compensation when it deems applicable, stating that loans “must not be put on hold on a blanket basis.”

Fannie Mae is clear that servicers must not jump the gun either, but rather must follow the letter of the law as it pertains to HAMP/HAFA guidelines.

In a July speech, Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, told loss mitigation servicers that, “if you have an abandoned property or a borrower not willing to discuss or work with anything, then get going [and foreclose],” he advised.

Fannie Mae allows several exceptions in the case where the property is occupied, unless “the borrower has displayed an obvious lack of concern for the mortgage obligation.”

In cases where the property is vacant or the borrower is not going to pay any of the mortgage, “servicers must expedite foreclosure proceedings under the greatest extent allowable by law.”

Written by Jacob Gaffney.

Puget Sound Single Family Residential Homes and Condominium Inventory Is Rising to Decade Highs

Just four months after the government’s famous first time home buyers credit, the inventory levels in Seattle and surrounding areas are on the rise – to their highest levels in over 10 years.  Furthermore, buyers are disappearing amidst record low interest rates.  This is resulting in lower prices.  There is more competition in the market than we’ve seen in the last ten years.

During the last three months of the first time homebuyer’s tax credit, the market was selling about 21-22% of the given monthly inventory.  However, since the program ended, the market has sputtered at around the 11% mark.  While $8000 in tax credit money helped first time homebuyers, most of the new home owners now own homes worth far less than they paid – just three months from program expiration I might add.  Understandably, there are more values to home ownership than purchase price, but this is a sour note to start on.

Giving the market a steroid injection – a.k.a. the first time home buyer program – left the market exposed to side effects.  We are now seeing the side effects from a lack of demand, combined with a short sale nightmare in our market.  Add in unemployment, a pay option arm problem and a country with a moral shift away from honoring mortgage obligations to big banks that took bailouts and you have yourself a perfect storm.

How do we get inventory levels right?  Simple, we sell what we have to sell.  That means lowering the prices to a point the market is happy to absorb heavy inventory levels.  This lowering of prices will be orderly, but I suggest the owners who move first will have the greatest chance to maximize the selling price on their properties.  As always, good selling.

If you would like to receive a free residential valuation analysis of your homes, then please contact us here!

How to Write a Short Sale Hardship Letter

Hardship Letters often make or break the result of you selling your home as a short sale. Banks focus on the hardship letter to see how you’re really affected personally with your financial situation. Learn how to write the best short sale hardship letter possible to get the bank to approve your short sale.

Instructions

1. First brainstorm about your hardship. Sit down, and write down every idea that pops in your head about why you can’t afford your house. Why are you having financial difficulties. Loss of job, medical bills, increased property taxes, child’s college education tuition, divorce, credit card debt, etc. Write every possible thought that has any affect on your financial situation or your wanting to get rid of the property. It doesn’t matter what you write down. Don’t think too much, just write whatever pops in your head. Sit and write until you have at least 5 ideas. If you don’t have 5, you’re thinking too much. Just write whatever pops in your head.

2. Now look at your hardship letter brainstorm list and pick the most obvious ones that have the most affect on your financial situation and ability to make payments on the home. Look at the list as if you were Countrywide, or Washington Mutual, or your specific bank. Which hardships would you look at as the most crucial? Once you select 3 or 4 hardships, focus on them and explain exactly why they are affecting your ability to make payments on the loan. (For example: I was laid off on Sept. 27 and as a result, my monthly income has decreased by $2,100.)

3. Now you’re ready to begin writing and putting together your hardship letter. Rule # 1, make your hardship letter less than one page, paragraph form. Short sale department reps look through many letters. They don’t want to be reading a novel to find out why you can’t afford your mortgage payments.

4. Line 1: At the top of the hardship letter type your bank’s name that you are requesting the short sale from. Line 2: put their address. Line 3: type their phone number and fax number. Skip a space. Line 4: type the date. Line 5: type “RE: Request for short sale – (Your Loan # and Property address).” Then, skip a line and start your letter with: “Dear (Bank’s Name) Representative:”

5. First paragraph: State a change. Mention what change took place why you can no longer afford your payments. Keep it brief and simply let them know that some change happened between the time you bought the home and now which has affected your ability to pay your mortgage loan. Ex: “There has been significant changes in in my financial situation since I purchased my home in October 2001.”

6. 2nd paragraph: State why your area is bad. Ex: “My property is located in ______ town. The taxes have increased, property values have declined, there are 5 foreclosures on my street, etc.” List any bad circumstances for your specific location.

7. 3rd and or 4th paragraph: List any of the following and explain using details and specific numbers as best as you can. Also include any wrong doing by mortgage loan broker, and/or bad adjustable mortgage loan on the property. As well, include hardships (income I depended on is no longer available, increased bills, inability to work due to health or disability, etc. – from your brainstorm list).

8. Final paragraph: Clearly state that you “cannot pay” and need to short sale the home. You don’t have any other options available. State your intent: do you want to keep your home or not? Leave your contact info or short sale agent’s contact info if they require further information.
Sign, date, and give to your short sale agent, attorney, or bank.
Tips & Warnings

  • Some short sale companies and agents are available to help you negotiate a short sale with your bank. You can often find a company that charges no upfront fees for you. (They take their payment out of the real estate commission when the home sells)
  • Be wary of some negotiating companies that charge an upfront “application or processing fee.” Some of these companies charge $999 upfront to desperate homeowners with promises of negotiating a short sale, loan modification, or some other solution between you and your bank, with no actual results.
  • There are some very good free or low cost services available to upside-down homeowners to help you negotiate with your bank and avoid foreclosure.

Beware the Loan Modification Merry-Go-Round

By Bob Sullivan

Originally posted: Friday, March 6 2009 at 05:00 am CT

There’s been a lot of talk lately about loan modifications for homeowners facing foreclosure, a discussion that reached a crescendo on Wednesday when the White House announced details of its “Making Home Affordable” plans.

A woman I’ll call Mags (we’re preserving her anonymity) had heard the talk too. The suburban Virginia woman in her 60s is homebound, recovering from ankle surgery. Her husband has recently declared bankruptcy. Three months ago, she started contacting her lender to ask for help. She ran into a wall of busy signals and vague answers. So when she heard about a private company that said it could help work with her bank to modify her loan and save her home, she began to investigate. That’s how she landed in my inbox.

“How can we tell that this company is legitimate, will do what they say they will?” she asked. “We desperately want to modify our mortgage, but we don’t want to be stupid!”

There was a red flag right away. Mags said the company wanted a $3,000 up-front payment.

I e-mailed Mags that day to ask her what this firm would do that she couldn’t do for herself. She didn’t write back. A few days later, I called. That morning, she’d sent the company a check for $2,881. And she was very sure she’d done the right thing. She’d checked the company out at the Better Business Bureau and there were no complaints. The employees sounded very competent, she said, and the company was advertising on television. I asked her if she’d seen advice on various Web sites telling consumers not to pay up-front fees for loan modifications. She said she had, and she’d asked the company about this.

“They said, ‘Has anything else you’ve done so far worked?”

I talked to Mags about how to get free loan modification help, through the list of approved housing counselors on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Web site. I sent her a link to HUD’s “find a counselor” Web page. She said she’d already been to the site, but didn’t find what she was looking for there.

“There are so many different agencies listed, how do you choose?” she asked, noting that about three dozen are listed in Virginia. “Are they all free? How can you tell?”

In the end she said she relied on the personal recommendation of a co-worker who had also signed up with the for-profit company.

Within minutes, Mags politely thanked me, rushed me off the phone and then didn’t respond to my additional e-mails. I had the sick feeling she wouldn’t get anything for her $2,881, but for some reason the modification company was more persuasive than I was. She was willing to pay for something that should be free.

No answer
So I went back to the HUD site and looked up the counselor that was geographically closest to Mags. When I called, the phone went unanswered. There wasn’t even an answering machine to leave a message, and an e-mail got no response.

Government efforts so far to help out troubled homeowners have been equally ineffectual. The Hope for Homeowners alliance program announced last year with great fanfare has so far only helped a few hundred mortgage holders.

It’s no wonder Mags would turn to a company that promised immediate assistance. In fact, swarms of for-profit companies are advertising loan modification help right now. They are succeeding because consumers still don’t really know where to turn, said Seattle-based mortgage fraud expert Richard Hagar.

“They are filling in where our government is failing,” he said. “The government says go get a housing counselor, but when you make a call there is not always somebody there.”

Many consumers have hit similar brick walls when dealing with lenders, Hagar said, creating an ideal opportunity for loan modification con artists.

At the unveiling of the White House loan modification program on Wednesday, officials reiterated that consumers don’t have to pay for mortgage help. Still, the pitches by for-profit firms can be very powerful, Hagar said.

“They say they have special phone numbers and can get you help right away,” he said.

The problem for people like Mags is that criminals and government-backed counselors can look identical to consumers who need help. The organizations listed on HUDs Web site – with names like Consumer Credit Counseling Services – seem indistinguishable from for-profit firms at first glance.

“Whether it’s a scam or it’s legitimate, it all starts off the same way,” he said.

Mortgage brokers piling in
To some struggling homeowners, the salesman behind the mortgage modification sales pitch might sound familiar, says Curtis Novy, a California-based mortgage broker who is also an expert on mortgage fraud. He said many of his former colleagues are trying to make a quick buck in the loan modification market.

“A lot of former subprime loan officers have discovered all this is a money maker,” he said. “They made money selling mortgages people couldn’t afford and are now making money modifying those mortgages.”

One online advertisement targeting real estate professionals recently viewed by msnbc.com promises mortgage brokers a healthy new revenue stream if they attend a class and learn loan modification skills.

“It just makes sense that you learn how to do loan modifications. A certain percent of the sellers you are coming across will qualify for a loan modification and you should be the one providing this service (and earning a fee for doing it),” it said.

Tanisha Warner, a spokeswoman for the Consumer Counseling Credit Services, she said she hears about consumers paying for modification help all the time.

“When people find their backs are against the wall, they are willing to believe that someone is going to help them,” she said, while stressing that her firm’s mortgage assistance services are free.

Not all for-pay loan help services are scams, though, so it’s hard to give blanket advice, Hagar said. Many consumers find it necessary to pay a lawyer to work out a complicated loan restructuring, for example, and there’s nothing wrong with paying a lawyer an up-front fee. Hagar said he’s also seen some legitimate services that charge a small up-front fee, and ask for larger payment upon the completion of a successful modification. As a rough guideline, he said, consumers should not pay more than a few hundred dollars up front, unless they are dealing with a lawyer.

Some government regulators have begun to take notice of potentially misleading modification services. In February, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced his office was investigating a company named H.O.P.E. Alliance after it allegedly asked for $1,500 in up-front payments from consumers. In order to afford the fee payment, the firm told customers to stop paying their mortgage, he said. The firm’s name also deceptively mimics the name of the government-backed, nonprofit modification effort, Blumenthal alleges.

On the Web site announcing the new White House loan aid plan – FinancialStability.Gov – federal officials also make clear that up-front payments are not necessary to get help.

“Beware of any person or organization that asks you to pay a fee in exchange for housing counseling services or modification of a delinquent loan. Do not pay – walk away!” it reads.

Still, that message hasn’t gotten through to consumers like Mags. And when HUD’s Web site lists phone numbers that go unanswered and banks give consumers the runaround, it’s no wonder troubled homeowners are tempted to pay when they finally find someone who will answer the phone.

As federal officials continue to create programs to help troubled homeowners, they should be sure their marketing plans are at least as extensive as those designed by con artists. HUDs counselors should be the first link that lands in a Google search, for example. Public service announcements from the president telling consumers where to get free help wouldn’t hurt either.

RED TAPE WRESTLING TIPS:

There is no reason to pay for mortgage help. When trying to get a HUD-approved counselor, persistence will pay off. Visit the HUD Web site and try several phone numbers until you reach someone who sounds genuinely interested in helping. Msnbc.com reached a counselor on our second try.

Beginning this week, you can test your eligibility for a government-backed loan modification at the Financial Stability Web site.

If you are tempted to pay someone, don’t do so until you get results. You wouldn’t pay for auto repairs or a home remodel until the work is done, so why pay a mortgage modification company? As a rough guideline, Hagar said, consumers should not pay more than a few hundred dollars up front unless they are dealing with a lawyer.

People facing mortgage problems often are embarrassed and try to deal with them privately. If anyone in your family might be in trouble, don’t be shy. Recommend they visit the HUD Web site – take them to a computer and show them the site if need be. HUD counselors can offer a variety of solutions to consumers. Warner said a surprising number of consumers are able to refinance and avoid foreclosure, thanks to new government-backed programs.

Are Loan Modifications Causing Foreclosures? By Richard Gaudreau

By Richard Gaudreau

Originally posted: August 20, 2010 10:58 AM

When the economy crumbled in 2008 as real estate values plummeted, Congress was under pressure to appease the public’s demand for action to stem the tide of foreclosures. Congress considered repealing the prohibition in the law against bankruptcy judges modifying the terms of predatory mortgages, but rejected that option, inexplicably taking its marching orders from bank lobbyists, the very industry that caused the economic collapse in the first place. Instead, in February, 2009, Congress passed HAMP, a loan modification program touted as the answer for American homeowners facing foreclosure. While HAMP permits the banks to pay “lip service” to their commitment to helping the American homeowner save their homes, the banks are well aware that most loan modifications requests fail. The banks are also aware that the price of failure is often a foreclosure precipitated at least in part by the HAMP requirement that homeowners must be in default on their mortgage before applying for a loan modification.

One-and-a-half years after HAMP, the foreclosure rate continues to soar. For every one of the past 17 months, foreclosures have remained above 300,000 per month, an unprecedented event in American history. According to RealtyTrac, the foreclosure numbers for the first half of 2010 increased by eight percent compared to 2009, and the 2nd quarter of 2010 set a record for the number of foreclosures in a three-month period. Not only is HAMP helping far fewer homeowners than promised, there’s some evidence that HAMP may be leaving more homeowners worse off than if they never had entered the “loan mod” program in the first place.

The government pays mortgage servicers $1,000 for each “loan mod” application. Studies have shown though that mortgage servicers stand to make far more in fees from a foreclosure than they ever will from a loan modification request. (Why Servicers Foreclose When They Should Modify, Nat. Cons. Law Center, 2010). No one has ever accused corporate America of not knowing how to put its own self-interest first. Perhaps this is why my client’s complaints sound a consistent theme about loan modifications. They describe a bureaucratic nightmare, fraught with delay, and requests for the same documents again and again. Phone calls go unanswered and messages unreturned. When clients do reach a live person, they complain that the answers they get vary depending on who happens to pick up the phone that day.

When homeowners ask their bank whether they’re eligible for a “loan mod,” they are incredulous to hear that they need to be at least 60 days behind on their mortgage in order to qualify. This is a rigid requirement. It doesn’t matter if a homeowner has managed to stay up to date only by liquidating a 401k or borrowing from parents. The bank won’t even consider a HAMP “loan mod” unless the mortgage is in default for 60 days. Many homeowners, already skating on thin ice financially, don’t need to be invited twice to begin missing mortgage payments. The banks do nothing to pre-screen homeowners to ensure they are good candidates for a loan modification. Unwitting homeowners, not realizing a loan modification will take from six to 12 months, often get far more than 60 days behind with the bank’s encouragement. In fact, one couple recently told me that the bank denied them a loan modification because they were “only” 60 days behind on the mortgage. The problem with requiring these kind of defaults is that it forces homeowners to bet their home on a successful outcome despite the fact most “loan mods” fail.

HAMP requires a trial period of payments before a “loan mod” receives final approval. I have had several clients stuck in “loan mod” limbo making probationary payments for more than six months. During this process, one received a call from a bank collector apparently working from a list of people behind on their mortgage. This person asked if she was interested in one of their “loan mod” programs. My client informed him that she already enrolled in one so she was not interested in applying. She later learned that her answer was misconstrued to mean she was not interested in any program, and her application was canceled. This left her several months behind on her mortgage without a solution, jeopardizing her home.

The overwhelming majority of “loan mods” are either denied outright or fail, leading to a foreclosure. One of my clients faced a foreclosure on July 30th after a “loan mod” denial, even though the HAMP regulations were amended in June 2010 to prohibit foreclosures while a “loan mod” is pending. One of the many problems with HAMP is that it is toothless, not providing any private right of action to homeowners to go to court to complain that their bank failed to follow HAMP regulations. This client had paid an internet company $2500 to do a loan modification for them. He still had to file a chapter 13 bankruptcy to save his home from foreclosure.

The government imposes no penalties for banks that have backlogs of hundreds of thousands of loan modification requests. Banks, overwhelmed by the number of loan mod applicants, find it easier to cut down on the number of applicants by losing paperwork and creating other unnecessary hoops for homeowners to jump through. Many homeowners are so discouraged by this kind of institutional arrogance that they just stop trying. To the banks, this is just a number’s game, and they don’t much care that there are real people facing real disasters on the other end of any “loan mod” request that slips between the cracks. As one bank told one of my clients, “we don’t need to work with you, we’ve already been bailed out.” There’s no bailout for the little guy.

That being said, there’s no reason a homeowner can’t complete a “loan mod” on their own if they are cautious. Here are some tips that might help homeowners trying to negotiate the ‘loan mod’ labyrinth on their own:

(1) Given that HAMP is helping far fewer homeowners than expected, do a reality check on your monthly budget before applying for a loan modification. If juggling credit card payments is the only way you are able to afford your mortgage every month, hoping to drop your mortgage payment low enough to afford all your credit card payments is probably not going to work. That’s like trying to hit the perfect golf shot in a difficult situation. I can say from long experience that this doesn’t happen very often, so you might not want to bet your house on the outcome. If you can’t pay everything, prioritize your debt based on what’s most important to you. If you’ve already applied for a “loan mod,” paying your credit cards from the extra money created by your reduced mortgage payments may lead to a foreclosure if you are denied, unless you have a rich uncle to bail you out.

(2) At the risk of oversimplifying, loan modifications are designed to lower your mortgage payment down to 31% of your gross income. If your mortgage payment is already lower than 31% of your gross, you probably won’t qualify.

(3) If you decide to do a “loan mod,” don’t pay an internet marketing company to do it for you. Your desperation makes you vulnerable to being scammed. Even if you get lucky, there’s nothing they will do that you can’t do for yourself. If you want help, call your local HUD office for the telephone number of a HUD loan modification counselor near you or call 1-888-995-HOPE (4673). They will help you for free.

(4) You might think providing all of the required documentation in a timely fashion is enough, but that just gets your foot in the door — you and the other few hundred thousand homeowners waiting for the same answer. Assume your bank is overwhelmed, will lose your paperwork and not return your phone calls as a means of controlling the number of “loan mods” it has to actually consider. Don’t take it personally. The clients that succeed have a bulldog persistence and aren’t shy about contacting their bank on a regular basis. Keep a copy of everything you provide the bank.

(5) Don’t get any more than 60 days behind on your mortgage unless you are ready to give up your home if you aren’t approved for a “loan mod.” If your bank insists that you have to be more than 60 days behind before being accepted for a loan modification, ask them to put it in writing and file a complaint. Try to bank the money saved by not paying your regular mortgage payment, or the “loan mod” process may leave you in a worse position than you were before applying.

(6) Keeping in mind that most banks have several “loan mod” programs available, you should make sure you’ve exhausted all the alternatives before accepting “no” for an answer. I had one client denied under HAMP who was able to avert a foreclosure by qualifying for another “loan mod” program, something the bank had never mentioned.

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Program

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Program

Many homeowners may feel that they can no longer afford their home, but want to avoid the negative effects of foreclosure. The Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Program offers homeowners, their mortgage servicers, and investors an incentive for completing a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. With these options, under HAFA, a homeowner leaves their home to transition to more affordable housing and alleviate the mortgage debt they owe.

These options are available for homeowners who: 1. do not qualify for a trial mortgage modification under the Making Home Affordable Program; 2. do not successfully complete the trial period for their modification; 3. miss at least two consecutive payments during their modification period; or 4. request a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

Short Sale

In a short sale, the servicer allows the homeowner to list and sell the mortgaged property with the understanding that the net proceeds from the sale may be less than the total amount due on the first mortgage. 

Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure

Generally, if the borrower makes a good faith effort to sell the property but is not successful, a servicer may consider a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. With a deed-in-lieu, the borrower voluntarily transfers ownership of the property to the servicer— provided the title is free and clear of mortgages, liens, and encumbrances.

The HAFA Program streamlines both of these options to make them easier for a homeowner to work with their servicer. Under the program, a homeowner can receive $3,000 to help with relocation costs.

Mortgage servicers and investors write their own guidelines under the Federal requirements to determine how to implement the program. For more information about your options, you should contact your mortgage servicer. If you have questions about the program, or want guidance about how these options may impact your personal situation, you may wish to speak to a HUD-approved housing counselor for free.

Your Graceful Exit

Watch a video to learn more about the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program.

Download a Brochure

Read more about the program.

Making Home Affordable and Other Options to Remain in Your Home

Mortgage servicers who participate in the Making Home Affordable Program are required to evaluate homeowners for a Home Affordable Modification before evaluating them for other options.  If you request a modification from your mortgage servicer, and are determined to be eligible, you will enter into a trial period plan.

If it is determined that you are not eligible for a Home Affordable Modification, your mortgage servicer will evaluate you for other alternatives they offer to keep you in your home, such as their own modification programs or a forbearance.

A HUD-approved housing counselor can work with you for free to help you understand your options.